2003–2021 · 70,440 MOT tests

Volvo XC90 MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Volvo XC90 did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

102About average

Best year201269.7% passed

Worst year200352.3% passed

Rank in Volvo9 of 17

Pass rate by year of registration

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Year	Tests	Passed	Average	Score
2021 XC90	6,648	86.9%	87.6%	99About average
2020 XC90	4,826	87.6%	86.9%	101About average
2019 XC90	7,130	86.5%	84.9%	102About average
2018 XC90	6,172	84.5%	82.5%	102Above average
2017 XC90	5,473	82.8%	79.8%	104Above average
2016 XC90	5,182	78.6%	76.6%	103Above average
2015 XC90	2,665	77.8%	73.5%	106Above average
2014 XC90	2,231	70.4%	69.9%	101About average
2013 XC90	2,360	69.4%	66.8%	104Above average
2012 XC90	2,841	69.7%	64.3%	108Well above average
2011 XC90	4,134	62.0%	61.8%	100About average
2010 XC90	5,787	61.1%	59.6%	103Above average
2009 XC90	3,186	62.1%	58.4%	106Above average
2008 XC90	1,544	60.6%	56.9%	107Above average
2007 XC90	2,384	55.5%	56.9%	98Below average
2006 XC90	2,285	56.1%	56.1%	100About average
2005 XC90	2,921	55.2%	56.5%	98Below average
2004 XC90	2,017	54.4%	56.4%	96Below average
2003 XC90	654	52.3%	57.3%	91Well below average

Share of all 70,440 tests.

Position lamp: not working4.1%
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm2.3%
Tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords1.7%
Decelerometer (sp): efficiency below requirements1.7%
Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick1.5%
Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements1.4%
Suspension arms - pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn1.4%
Rbt (sp): efficiency less than 50% of the required value1.3%