1999–2006 · 7,406 MOT tests

Rover 75 MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Rover 75 did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

101About average
Best year200660.8% passed
Worst year200455.5% passed
Rank in Rover3 of 4

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%1999: 62.4% passed (average for its age 63.3%)19992000: 64.5% passed (average for its age 61.5%)20002001: 58.4% passed (average for its age 59.4%)20012002: 59.0% passed (average for its age 58.1%)20022003: 57.6% passed (average for its age 57.3%)20032004: 55.5% passed (average for its age 56.4%)20042005: 58.1% passed (average for its age 56.5%)20052006: 60.8% passed (average for its age 56.1%)2006

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2006 7518160.8%56.1%
108Well above average
2005 751,01458.1%56.5%
103Above average
2004 752,04955.5%56.4%
98About average
2003 751,68357.6%57.3%
101About average
2002 751,26659.0%58.1%
102About average
2001 7569558.4%59.4%
98About average
2000 7537764.5%61.5%
105Above average
1999 7514162.4%63.3%
99About average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 7,406 tests.

  1. Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength7.0%
  2. Suspension arms - pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn4.4%
  3. Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect4.2%
  4. Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements3.9%
  5. SRS malfunction indicator lamp: warning lamp indicates a fault3.5%
  6. Suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn3.2%
  7. Coil spring: fractured or broken3.1%
  8. Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded2.6%

Other Rover models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Rover MINI9,477
106Above average
Rover 253,109
107Above average
Rover 451,905
96Below average