2002–2005 · 1,181 MOT tests

MG ZT MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the MG ZT did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

118Well above average
Best year200468.3% passed
Worst year200364.5% passed
Rank in MG2 of 9

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%2002: 67.5% passed (average for its age 58.1%)20022003: 64.5% passed (average for its age 57.3%)20032004: 68.3% passed (average for its age 56.4%)20042005: 68.2% passed (average for its age 56.5%)2005

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2005 ZT28068.2%56.5%
121Well above average
2004 ZT46368.3%56.4%
121Well above average
2003 ZT28764.5%57.3%
113Well above average
2002 ZT15167.5%58.1%
116Well above average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 1,181 tests.

  1. Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength3.7%
  2. SRS malfunction indicator lamp: warning lamp indicates a fault3.6%
  3. Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements3.3%
  4. Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded2.9%
  5. Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm2.0%
  6. Track rod end: ball joint has excessive play1.9%
  7. Service brake performance: excessively binding1.7%
  8. Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect1.6%

Other MG models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
MG ZS41,370
98Below average
MG TF9,034
120Well above average
MG HS Exclusive7,799
103Above average
MG Mgf5,458
108Above average
MG 5 Exclusive3,978
99About average
MG HS3,421
101About average
MG GS2,591
91Well below average
MG ZR1,789
112Well above average