Comparison · small SUVs
Renault Captur vs Toyota C-HR: which is more reliable?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 98 for the Renault Captur, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 236,224 real MOT tests in 2024.
Renault Captur
Toyota C-HR
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Renault Captur | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102About average | 102Above average |
| 6–9 years | 98About average | 101About average |
| 10–14 years | 92Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Renault Captur | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Tyres | 6.5 | 4.2 |
| Suspension | 9.4 | 0.5 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 3.9 | 5.9 |
| Brakes | 7.2 | 1.6 |
| Body & chassis | 1.9 | 0.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 1.1 | 0.0 |
| Steering | 0.4 | 0.1 |
Renault Captur: top failures
Toyota C-HR: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Renault Captur or the Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 98 for the Renault Captur, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Renault Captur and Toyota C-HR can be compared?
Both were tested for 6 registration years (2016–2021). The Renault Captur had the higher pass rate in 2 of them and the Toyota C-HR in 4.
What fails most on each?
Renault Captur: suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn; tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm. Toyota C-HR: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; headlamp: not working on dipped beam.