Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Puma vs Kia Stonic: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma and Kia Stonic are very close at the MOT: scores of 105 and 103. Pick on the condition and history of the actual car. Based on 82,110 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Puma
Kia Stonic
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Puma | Kia Stonic |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 105Above average | 103Above average |
| 6–9 years | – | 104Above average |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | 101About average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Puma | Kia Stonic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 1.8 | 4.7 |
| Brakes | 2.3 | 3.9 |
| Tyres | 3.2 | 2.9 |
| Lights & electrics | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Suspension | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| Body & chassis | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.5 | 0.1 |
Ford Puma: top failures
Kia Stonic: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Puma or the Kia Stonic?
The Ford Puma and Kia Stonic are very close at the MOT: scores of 105 and 103. Pick on the condition and history of the actual car.
Which years of the Ford Puma and Kia Stonic can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Ford Puma had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the Kia Stonic in 0.
What fails most on each?
Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high. Kia Stonic: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick.